Out of the Box Coaching and
Breakthroughs with the Enneagram, Mary R. Bast, Ph.D. 
Copyright © 1999. All rights reserved. Revised: January 21, 2012
  

Click on "Contact" below left to send email   

 

 

 

 


Follow My Blogs:   Self-Coaching Tips    ► Coach Mentor


Everything Belongs

I saw from your web site that you explore relationships between Buddhism and the Enneagram. I offered to preset a little talk about Buddhism at my church group next week. I'd love to use the Enneagram as a framework to talk about Buddhism. Do you have anything I could use/read to prepare for my talk?

Yes, I gave a sermon in 2006 at the Unitarian Universalist church here in Gainesville. The first reading in the order of service was from Charlotte Joko Beck's Nothing Special: Living Zen, "The Cocoon of Pain" (pp. 10-11):

"We have many ways to cope with life, many ways to worship comfort and pleasantness. All are based on the same thing: the fear of encountering any kind of unpleasantness.

If we must have absolute order and control, it's because we're trying to avoid any unpleasantness. If we can have things our way, and get angry if they're not, then we think we can survive and shut out our anxiety about death. 

If we can please everyone, then we imagine no unpleasantness will enter our life. 

We hope that if we can be the star of the show, shining and wonderful and efficient, we can have such an admiring audience that we won't have to feel anything. 

If we can withdraw from the world and just entertain ourselves with our own dreams and fantasies and emotional upheavals, we think we can escape unpleasantness. 

If we can figure everything out, if we can be so smart that we can fit everything into some sort of a plan or order, a complete intellectual understanding, then perhaps we won't be threatened. 

If we can submit to an authority, have it tell us what to do, then we can give someone else the responsibility for our lives and we don't have to carry it anymore. 

We don't have to feel the anxiety of making a decision. If we pursue life madly, going after any pleasant sensation, any excitement, any entertainment, perhaps we won't have to feel any pain. 

If we can tell others what to do, keep them well under control, under our foot, maybe they can't hurt us. 

If we can 'bliss out,' if we can be a mindless 'Buddha' just relaxing in the sun, we don't have to assume any responsibility for the world's unpleasantness. We can just be happy. 

All these are versions of the god we actually worship. It is the god of no discomfort and no unpleasantness. Without exception, every being on earth pursues it to some degree. As we pursue it, we lose touch with what really is. As we lose touch, our life spirals downward. And the very unpleasantness that we sought to avoid can overwhelm us.

This has been the problem of human life since the beginning of time. All philosophies and all religions are varying attempts to deal with this basic fear. Only when such attempts fail us are we ready to begin serious practice. And they do fail. Because the systems we adopt are not based upon reality; they can't work, despite all of our feverish efforts. Sooner or later, we come to realize that something is amiss." 

The responsive reading was from Richard Rohr's Everything Belongs:

"We are usually trapped in what we call normalcy, 'the way things are.' We wait for who we are. We wait for the truth. We wait for the vision of the whole. We have to allow ourselves to be drawn into sacred space. We have to move out of "business as usual" and remain on the threshold where the old world is left behind, but we're not sure of the new one yet. In sacred space the old world is able to fall apart, and the new world is able to be revealed. In this new realm, everything belongs. This awareness is often called a second naiveté. It is a return to simple consciousness. The first awareness doesn't know but thinks it does. In second naiveté the darkness and light coexist, paradox is revealed, and we are finally at home in the only world that ever existed. How do we do it? We stand in the middle, living and fully accepting our reality, neither taking this new awareness on from the power position nor denying it for fear of the pain it will bring. We do not think ourselves into new ways of living. We live ourselves into new ways of thinking."

A diagram was available for people to follow during the sermon (click here and scroll to third page).

My sermon focused on the nine Enneagram worldviews as nine spiritual paths (click here for sermon notes), with members of the congregation invited to (a) listen to understand, (b) open their hearts, and (c) feel deep in their bones which worldview drives their behavior and keeps their focus narrow. Below are the nine spiritual paths. Though each path addresses an Enneagram worldview, all nine provide everyone with opportunities for spiritual growth:

  1. Patience: respond where personal intervention is required and acquiesce when letting go is appropriate.

  2. Humility: accept yourself, acknowledge your own needs and realistic limitations.

  3. Truthfulness: express yourself without covering, exaggerating, or marketing an image or role.

  4. Equanimity: act on principles without exaggeration or dramatization.

  5. Nonattachment: engage with others for mutual enrichment without withholding.

  6. Courage: responsibility for one's own beliefs, decisions.

  7. Temperance: a sense of proportion, accepting grieving as an organic process that won't unfold if rushed; one can be more fully with joy if also present to pain.

  8. Innocence: approaching life with more child-like trust, without a chip on your shoulder.

  9. Active engagement: actualizing yourself by fully experiencing your own wishes and emotions; acting upon your own purpose without distraction.